Unofficial guide

GPU Unlock benchmarks

Numbers reported by the upstream projects. Outputs are bit-identical; only speed changes.

BF16 dense matmul, stock power limits

StockUnlockedTFLOPS
RTX 3060
27 → 51
+89%
RTX 3060 Ti
37 → 68
+84%
RTX 3070
40 → 72
+80%
RTX 3080
65 → 113
+74%
RTX 3090
75 → 125
+67%
RTX 4070 Ti
81 → 150
+85%
RTX 3090 Ti*
88 → 157
+78%
RTX 4080
104 → 193
+86%
RTX 4090*
165 → 329
+99%

* RTX 4090 is the peak MMA rate; at stock power it gains much less in large GEMMs.

CardStockUnlockedBF16 gain
RTX 3090 Ti88157+78%
RTX 309075125+67%
RTX 308065113+74%
RTX 30704072+80%
RTX 3060 Ti3768+84%
RTX 30602751+89%
RTX 4090165329+99%
RTX 4080104193+86%
RTX 4070 Ti81150+85%

Source: Zagitta/gpu-unlock

What gets faster

Faster

  • LLM prefill (vLLM, PyTorch, FP16/BF16, AWQ/GPTQ)+25–55%
  • Time to first token−25–30%
  • LoRA and full fine-tuning in BF16+25–50%
  • Image generation (SDXL, SD 1.5, DiT in ComfyUI)+30–55%
  • Video generation (Wan 2.2, BF16)+15–20%
  • FlashAttention / SDPA kernels+50–60%

Unchanged

  • llama.cpp / Ollama with quantized GGUF0–15%
  • Token generation (memory bound)0%
  • INT8, FP8 and INT4 models0%
  • Gaming and FP32 CUDA0%

Ada matched runs

TFLOP/sStockUnlockedSource
RTX 4090 · FP16→FP32 instruction rate160.4320.4JustAResearcher/gpu-unlock-ada
RTX 4090 · cuBLAS FP16 GEMM—+12–34%JustAResearcher/gpu-unlock-ada
RTX 4070 Ti SUPER · FP16→FP32 (240 W)95.0189.9JustAResearcher/gpu-unlock-ada
RTX 4070 Ti SUPER · TF32→FP3247.4994.51JustAResearcher/gpu-unlock-ada
RTX 2080 Ti · cuBLAS FP16 8192³ (250 W)52.877.9nlzy/turing-unlock

How to read these

01

Instruction rates show the cap is gone. Application speed depends on power headroom.

02

Memory-bound work, such as token generation, does not change.

03

Most rows are one card and one boot. Post your own in the upstream issues.